Uganda Pentecostal University Logo

NAVIGATING THE COMPLEXITIES OF ABORTION: AN EXPLORATION OF THE RIGHTS OF INTERESTED PARTIES, DOCTOR-PATIENT DYNAMICS, AND THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY CONTEXT

Authors
  • Peter

    Author

  • Salome

    Author

  • Patricia

    Author

Keywords:
Array, Array, Array
Abstract

Doctor – Patient relationship is not a new concept in medical practice and ethics -it is the foundation of medical practice. The concept governs the interaction between doctors and patients. This relationship is integral in the practice of healthcare delivery, in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. This research discussed the evolution of this relationship, rights and duties of doctors and patients and existing challenges in achieving a smooth relationship. The research methodology adopted was the doctrinal legal research methodology. Findings showed that there were factors that inhibited the realization of doctor-patient relationship; some were doctor related, while others were patient related and others were factors outside the doctors and patients. Recommendations were made on how to improve on this relationship.  These include training and retraining of doctors, introduction of simplified patient health education and establishment of a comprehensive health insurance policy, among others

References

Abiola, T., Udofia, O., & Abdullahi, A. T. (2014). Patient-doctor relationship: The practice orientation of doctors in Kano. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 17(2), 241–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.127567

American Medical Association. (2012). Opinion 10.01: Fundamental elements of the patient-physician relationship. Code of Medical Ethics.

Blake, V. (2012). When is a patient-physician relationship established? AMA Journal of Ethics, 14(5), 403–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.5.hlaw1-1205

Chand, N., Subrimanya, B., & Rao, V. (n.d.). Management of patients who refuse blood transfusion. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pm4260316

Curran, J. (2007). The doctor, his patient and the illness. The BMJ, 335(7676). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2048858/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39384.467928.94

Drossman, D. A., & Swantkowski, D. D. (n.d.). Improving the doctor-patient relationship. University of North Carolina School of Medicine. https://www.med.unc.edu/ibs/files/educational-gi-handouts/improving-the-Patient-Doctor-Relationship.pdf

Ezekiel, E., & Emanuel, L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA, 262(16). https://d.umn.edu/~jfitzakel/lectures/medschool/GIMweb2003/cml/Emanuel/andEmanuelJAMA1992.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480160079038

Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2006). Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interaction: 30 years of research. Annual Review of Sociology, 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.082905.093959

Kaba, R., & Sooriakumaram, P. (2007). The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. International Journal of Surgery, 1(1). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17386916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.01.005

Loh, K. Y., & Sivalingam, N. (2008). Enhancing doctor-patient relationship: The humanistic approach. The Medical Journal of Malaysia, 63(1), 85–87.

Ogungbo, B. I. (n.d.). Medical negligence: A doctor’s perspective. The Lawyer’s Chronicle. https://thelawyerschronicle.com/medical-negligence-a-doctors-perspective/

Oparaji, A. O. (2006). Hospitals without consulting rooms: An ethical assessment of physician-patient relationship in medical internet.

Roter, D. L., Rude, R. E., & Comings, J. (1998). Patient literacy: A barrier to quality of care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13(12), 850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00250.x

Published
2025-04-17
Section
Article
License

Copyright (c) 2025 Uganda Pentecostal University Journal of Sustainable Development

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The Uganda Pentecostal University Journal of Sustainable Development (UPUJSD) is an open-access academic journal that provides a platform for research and discussion on various dimensions of sustainable development. The journal covers topics including but not limited to:

  • Sustainable agriculture and food security
  • Sustainable development and artificial intelligence
  • Renewable energy and environmental sustainability
  • Community development and social entrepreneurship
  • Climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies
  • Sustainable urban planning and infrastructure development
  • Gender equality and social inclusion in sustainable development initiatives
  • Sustainable development and the law
  • Aspects of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

All content published in UPUJSD is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license:

  1. Attribution: Authors and publishers must be credited when the work is shared or cited.
  2. Non-Commercial: The material may not be used for commercial purposes.
  3. No Derivatives: If the material is remixed, transformed, or built upon, the modified material may not be distributed.

The license aims to promote knowledge sharing and collaboration while protecting the authors' original works.

For further details on the licensing terms or submission guidelines, contact us at:

How to Cite

NAVIGATING THE COMPLEXITIES OF ABORTION: AN EXPLORATION OF THE RIGHTS OF INTERESTED PARTIES, DOCTOR-PATIENT DYNAMICS, AND THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY CONTEXT. (2025). Uganda Pentecostal University Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.69612/upujsd-2025-11-005

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.